phone Int.Acad.Publications,
Welcome to
Ιnternational Conference on Economics, Engineering, Applied Computational Science (EEACS)

Review Process

    The Ιnternational Conference on Economics, Engineering, Applied Computational Science (EEACS) sends each paper to a great number of independent reviewers, experts in the area of the paper. Each paper is evaluated from at least three independent experts according to the following Criteria:

    1) Relevance to the Topics of the Conference
    2) Scientific - Technical Originality, Potential Impact and Interest for the audience
    3) Scientific/Technical Content and Advances beyond The State-Of-The-Art
    4) Quality of the Presentation, clarity of the Content
    5) Comments for the authors

    The reviewers are going to indicate their familiarity with the paper's subject, evaluate the paper along the aforementioned criteria. Finally, the Editor-in-Chief or a Member of the Editorial Board will decide whether a paper will be accepted or not.

    Our Score System will classify the papers as follows:
    * Publish as it is
    * Consider after Minor Changes
    * Consider after Major Changes
    * Reject it
    If the Editor recommends "Publish as it is", then the manuscript will undergo a final check by the conference's editorial office in order to ensure that the manuscript and its review process adhere to the conference's guidelines and policies. Once this is done, the authors will be notified of the manuscript's acceptance, and the manuscript will appear in the Articles in Press section of the conference's website.

    If the Editor recommends "Consider after Minor Changes," the authors are notified to prepare and submit a final copy of their manuscript with the required minor changes suggested by the reviewers. The Editor reviews the revised manuscript after the minor changes have been made by the authors. Once the Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, the manuscript can be accepted.

    If the Editor recommends "Consider after Major Changes," the recommendation is communicated to the authors. The authors are expected to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the changes recommended by the reviewers and to submit their revised manuscript in a timely manner. Once the revised manuscript is submitted, the Editor can then make an editorial recommendation which can be "Publish Unaltered", "Consider after Minor Changes", "Reject."

    If the Editor recommends rejecting the manuscript, the rejection is immediate. Also, if the majority of the reviewers recommend rejecting the manuscript, the rejection is immediate.
    The conference is committed to publishing only original material, i.e., material that has neither been published elsewhere, nor is under review elsewhere.
    Manuscripts that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors, whether published or unpublished, will incur plagiarism sanctions.